B2B Assignments and Grading

Home | Contact | Search

 

Home
Up

MKTG 533: Business-to-Business Marketing

Dr. Gary Lilien/ Dr. Ralph Oliva

Grading

Fall 2006

Assignments and Evaluation Method:

This course will involve extensive action learning and class participation. Class assignments include: 

·         Team-based case preparation and presentation -- 30% of Grade

·         Individual quick write-ups on 5 additional cases --"Case Insights" -- 50% of Grade

·         Class participation -- 20% of Grade

We will be covering the following cases and exercises this term:

13 Sept      Account Pricing for the ABCOR 2000 (I)

18 Sept      Commercializing the Kunst 1600 Dry Piston Vacuum Pump (I, P)

20 Sept      Amscat Corporation (I)

27 Sept      Durr Environmental Controls (I, P)

  4 Oct       Hercules Fasteners (I)

11 Oct       Addison Wesley Longman Portfolio Analysis Case (I,P)

11 Oct       ABB Electric (I,P)

16 Oct       C-Tek Corporation Case (I,P)

18 Oct        KONE Case (I)

 

I= Insight Case    P=Presentation Case

 

Note that five cases will be presented and all nine above are candidates for Insights.   Students are encouraged to provide insights for ALL cases they are not presenting; scores on the best five insights will be counted toward your grade

Grading

A+       Really outstanding. Only one group in the whole class may get this through the course of the semester. Totally new insights, frameworks for thinking, or tools for case analysis.

 

A         Great work. Obviously well thought through, recognized key insights and lessons, brought new knowledge to bear on the problem, internally very consistent, great presentation.

 

A-        Very good work, well beyond what was expected.

 

B+       Thorough and solid work a bit beyond what was expected. Covers most important insights, worked through most important issues.

 

B         What was expected. Good solid work, good groundwork in the fundamentals, solid presentation and write-up, covered all the bases.

 

B-        The basics covered basically. Reflected some honest work on the problem, summarized the basics well, hit the key points, missed one or more of the key lessons to be learned in the case, didn't put the case presentation together effectively.

 

C/D     Blew it. Shoddy work, cursorily covered the basics, didn't really bring anything new to the ballgame.

 

 

Hit Counter

This site is for educational purposes and for the advancement of Business to Business Practices. © Ralph Oliva, 2003